<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Chessbase Archieven - HEESEN Online</title>
	<atom:link href="https://heesen.online/tag/chessbase/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://heesen.online/tag/chessbase/</link>
	<description>Blogs van Jos Heesen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2025 12:27:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>nl-NL</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Game of Kings, King of Games</title>
		<link>https://heesen.online/game-of-kings-king-of-games/</link>
					<comments>https://heesen.online/game-of-kings-king-of-games/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JosWP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2021 15:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Schaken]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teksten in het Nederlands/Dutch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Jonathan Butler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carlsen - Karjakin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chessbase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Navarra]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heesen.online/?p=1001</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In het boek "The Grandmaster" over de match om het Wereldkampioenschap tussen Carlsen en Karjakin in New York 2016 van Brian Jonathan Butler, las ik het volgende fragment over de "duurzaamheid" van het schaakspel:</p>
<p>"It’s not an accident that chess has been one of the most durable things humanity has created in the last fifteen hundred years. Think of all the precious, cherished things people have lost in that time along the way to the present: languages, religions, civilizations, entire bloodlines, endless artifacts, and countless stories cast into a common darkness. How did something so seemingly trivial as chess prove so much more durable and immune to the friction and chaos of history? Any child can learn the basics in minutes, yet no human mind will ever be capable of solving it any more than an abacus has a prayer of measuring a black hole."</p>
<p>Het bericht <a href="https://heesen.online/game-of-kings-king-of-games/">Game of Kings, King of Games</a> verscheen eerst op <a href="https://heesen.online">HEESEN Online</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In het boek &#8220;<em>The Grandmaster</em>&#8221; over de match om het Wereldkampioenschap tussen Carlsen en Karjakin in New York 2016 van <em>Brian Jonathan Butler</em>, las ik het volgende fragment over de &#8220;duurzaamheid&#8221; van het schaakspel:</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">&#8220;<em>It’s not an accident that chess has been one of the most durable things humanity has created in the last fifteen hundred years. Think of all the precious, cherished things people have lost in that time along the way to the present: languages, religions, civilizations, entire bloodlines, endless artifacts, and countless stories cast into a common darkness. How did something so seemingly trivial as chess prove so much more durable and immune to the friction and chaos of history? Any child can learn the basics in minutes, yet no human mind will ever be capable of solving it any more than an abacus has a prayer of measuring a black hole</em>.&#8221;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ofwel:</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">&#8220;<em>Het is geen toeval dat schaken een van de meest duurzame dingen is die de mensheid de afgelopen vijftienhonderd jaar heeft gecreëerd. Denk aan alle kostbare, gekoesterde dingen die mensen in die tijd op weg naar het heden zijn verloren: talen, religies, beschavingen, hele bloedlijnen, eindeloze artefacten en talloze verhalen die in een gemeenschappelijke duisternis zijn gegoten. Hoe kon iets dat zo ogenschijnlijk triviaal is als schaken zoveel duurzamer en immuun zijn voor de wrijving en chaos van de geschiedenis? Elk kind kan de basisbeginselen in minuten leren, maar geen enkele menselijke geest zal ooit in staat zijn om het op te lossen, net zomin als een abacus een kans heeft om een ​​zwart gat te meten.</em>&#8220;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Dat geeft wel te denken.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="carlsen-karjakin-match-new-york-2016">Carlsen &#8211; Karjakin match New York 2016</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">De bewuste match ging tussen regerend wereldkampioen <a href="https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnus_Carlsen">Magnus Carlsen</a> en uitdager <a href="https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergej_Karjakin">Sergej Karjakin</a>. Carlsen was wereldkampioen sinds 2013, Karjakin werd uitdager door het <a href="https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kandidatentoernooi">kandidatentoernooi</a> van 2016 te winnen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">De match werd gespeeld in New York vanaf 11 tot en met 30 november en ging over 12 klassieke partijen, waarna de stand 6–6 was. Carlsen verloor de 8e, maar won de 10e partij; alle andere partijen eindigden in remise.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Vervolgens werd er een tiebreak van vier rapid-partijen gespeeld, die Carlsen met 3–1 won en daarmee zijn wereldtitel prolongeerde. De slotzet van de hele match was direct ook de allermooiste van de hele match. Dit is de partij, geanalyseerd door David Navarra op de Chessbase site:</p>




<p class="rpbchessboard-spacerBefore"></p>

<div class="rpbchessboard-chessgame">
    <noscript>
        <div class="rpbchessboard-javascriptWarning">
            Je dient JavaScript te activeren om de weergave van een schaakpartij te optimaliseren.        </div>
    </noscript>
    <div id="rpbchessboard-6ae66ebd3a72a-1"></div>
    <script type="text/javascript">
        (function() {
            function renderThisPGN() {
                RPBChessboard.renderPGN("rpbchessboard-6ae66ebd3a72a-1", {"pgn":"[Event \"World-ch Carlsen-Karjakin Tiebreak\"]\n[Site \"New York\"]\n[Date \"2016.11.30\"]\n[Round \"4\"]\n[White \"Carlsen, Magnus\"]\n[Black \"Karjakin, Sergey\"]\n[Result \"1-0\"]\n[ECO \"B55\"]\n[WhiteElo \"2853\"]\n[BlackElo \"2772\"]\n[Annotator \"Navara,David\"]\n[PlyCount \"99\"]\n[EventDate \"2016.11.30\"]\n[EventType \"match (rapid)\"]\n[EventRounds \"4\"]\n[EventCountry \"USA\"]\n[SourceTitle \"CBM 176\"]\n[Source \"ChessBase\"]\n[SourceDate \"2017.01.17\"]\n[SourceVersion \"1\"]\n[SourceVersionDate \"2017.01.17\"]\n[SourceQuality \"1\"]\n\n\n{It is very hard to win with Black on demand. On the other hand, it not easy\nto play such a game with White, either. The subconscious desire to make a draw\nmight lead to concessions and gradually to a deterioration of one&#8217;s position.\nMagnus coped with this task excellently. He played for the win while not\navoiding a possible move repetition, thus forcing Sergey to make further\nconcessions.} 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. f3 e5 6. Nb3 Be7 (\n6... d5 {is a decent move, but White should not have too many problems after}\n7. Bg5 {.} {The main continuation} Be6 (7... d4 $5 {deserves serious attention.\nIt has already been played by strong players like Vachier-Lagrave, Cheparinov\nand Navara. Black can achieve a double-edged position without making too many\nconcessions.}) 8. Bxf6 gxf6 9. exd5 Qxd5 10. Qxd5 Bxd5 11. Nc3 {leads to an\nequal endgame which is fairly safe for White.}) ({There is a nice trap:} 6...\na5 7. c4 $6 (7. Bb5+ Nc6 8. Nc3) 7... Nxe4 $1 8. fxe4 Qh4+ 9. Kd2 a4 {with\nBlack&#8217;s edge. To be honest, I failed to find 7&#8230;Nxe4 myself several years ago.\nBut it would be too naive to expect Magnus to miss it.}) 7. c4 a5 {Now White&#8217;s\nbishop cannot go to b5 anymore. Both sides have created considerable\nweaknesses in their camps, viz. the squares d4 (White) or b5 and d5 (Black).}\n8. Be3 a4 9. Nc1 O-O 10. Nc3 Qa5 11. Qd2 Na6 (11... Be6 {might have been a bit\nmore flexible. I would like to play Be7-d8-b6 to exchange the bad bishop, but\nWhite can probably prevent it. Black should rather play &#8230;Rc8, attacking the\nc4-pawn.} 12. b3 $5 axb3 13. Nxb3 {might well be critical from the theoretical\npoint of view.}) 12. Be2 Nc5 13. O-O Bd7 14. Rb1 Rfc8 15. b4 $1 {It is\nimportant to protect the c4-pawn. White opens the a-file, but Black&#8217;s rook\ncannot penetrate.} axb3 16. axb3 Qd8 17. Nd3 $14 {White has achieved a\npleasant position. His pawn structure is better and Black does not have\nadequate counterplay.} Ne6 18. Nb4 Bc6 (18... Nf4 $5 {might have been an\noption, the idea being} 19. Bxf4 Qb6+ ({or even} 19... exf4 20. Nbd5 Nxd5 21.\nNxd5 g5 {Still, it is hard to imagine Black winning such a position. The text\nmaintains more tension.}) 20. Be3 Qxb4) 19. Rfd1 h5 $1 {I like this decision.\nBlack starts counterplay on the dark squares around White&#8217;s king.} (19... Ne8 {\nfollowed by Bg5 might have been objectively better, but it led to a worse\nendgame after} 20. Nbd5 Bg5 21. Nb6 Qxb6 22. Bxb6 Bxd2 23. Rxd2 {.}) 20. Bf1 h4\n21. Qf2 (21. Nbd5 Bxd5 22. exd5 Nf4 {might objectively be better for White,\nbut giving up the control of the d5-square looks unnecessary.}) 21... Nd7 (\n21... Nh5 {allows both} 22. Ncd5 ({and} 22. Nxc6 bxc6 23. c5)) 22. g3 {The\ncomputer dislikes this move, but it is not easy to suggest anything better.\nKomodo&#8217;s suggestion 22.Kh1 is too mysterious for me and} ({direct\ncontinuations like} 22. Nxc6 bxc6 23. b4 {also have their drawbacks, as the\nd4-square could eventually become weak after something like} c5 $5 {.}) 22...\nRa3 $6 (22... Bg5 {might have been a better try. White had better not take the\nd6-pawn:} 23. Bxg5 (23. Rxd6 $6 Qf8 $1) 23... Qxg5 24. Rxd6 (24. Nc2 $1 $14)\n24... Qe7 25. Rbd1 Nd4 26. R6xd4 $1 exd4 27. Ncd5 $13) 23. Bh3 Rca8 24. Nc2\nR3a6 25. Nb4 Ra5 {Sergey bravely avoids the repetition, but his position\nremains worse.} 26. Nc2 b6 27. Rd2 Qc7 28. Rbd1 Bf8 29. gxh4 $5 {A somewhat\nsurprising decision. White opens the kingside, as Black cannot exploit the\nweakness of the f4-square.} Nf4 30. Bxf4 ({The computer suggests} 30. Bxd7 Qxd7\n31. Kh1 {and takes on f4 later, but White&#8217;s continuation is also fairly strong.\n}) 30... exf4 31. Bxd7 $1 Qxd7 32. Nb4 Ra3 33. Nxc6 Qxc6 34. Nb5 Rxb3 ({\nBlack could hardly play for the win after} 34... Ra1 {.}) 35. Nd4 Qxc4 36. Nxb3\nQxb3 {White has a material advantage. It is not easy to convert, as his king\nis a bit exposed. On the other hand, Black&#8217;s bishop is passive and his king is\nnot safe, either.} 37. Qe2 Be7 38. Kg2 Qe6 39. h5 Ra3 40. Rd3 Ra2 41. R3d2 Ra3\n42. Rd3 Ra7 43. Rd5 Rc7 44. Qd2 Qf6 (44... Qh6 45. Rf5 Rc5 46. Qxf4 Qxf4 47.\nRxf4 Rg5+ 48. Rg4 Rxh5 {might have been a bit more tenacious, but it would\nhave been equivalent to a resignation in the match.}) 45. Rf5 Qh4 46. Rc1 Ra7\n47. Qxf4 Ra2+ 48. Kh1 Qf2 49. Rc8+ Kh7 {It looks as if Black were suddenly\nwinning, but Magnus had foreseen everything and finished the match in style.}\n{[#]}\n50. Qh6+ $3 {and Black resigned before an inevitable mate. It was a\nfascinating conclusion to a very tense match. Sergey Karjakin deserves every\ncredit for his strong play. He and his team prepared for the match excellently\nand could have won it. He showed that it is possible to play against Magnus on\nequal terms and that the Norwegian&#8217;s throne isn&#8217;t unshakeable. But I also\nbelieve that Magnus deserves the title. He has been the world&#8217;s number 1 for\nmany years and he is the strongest player in the world. He did not lose in the\nclassical part of the match and eventually prevailed in rapid chess.} 1-0","pieceSymbols":"localized","navigationBoard":"frame","withPlayButton":true,"withFlipButton":true,"withDownloadButton":true,"nboSquareSize":32,"nboCoordinateVisible":true,"nboTurnVisible":true,"nboColorset":"original","nboPieceset":"cburnett","nboAnimated":true,"nboMoveArrowVisible":true,"nboMoveArrowColor":"b","nboSound":true,"idoSquareSize":32,"idoCoordinateVisible":true,"idoTurnVisible":true,"idoColorset":"original","idoPieceset":"cburnett"});
            }
            if (document.readyState === 'loading') {
                document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', renderThisPGN);
            }
            else {
                renderThisPGN();
            }
        })();
    </script>
</div>

<p class="rpbchessboard-spacerAfter"></p>

<p>Het bericht <a href="https://heesen.online/game-of-kings-king-of-games/">Game of Kings, King of Games</a> verscheen eerst op <a href="https://heesen.online">HEESEN Online</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://heesen.online/game-of-kings-king-of-games/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
